THE CALIBRATION


Beloved Brand, Broken Model

When topline performance masks bottom-line erosion


At Harms, we protect the privacy of our clients. All case study Calibrations are anonymized to protect our partners' brand. What you’ll read here reflects real interventions, systemic truths, and outcome shifts, without compromising the relationships that made them possible.

The Inflection Point

Despite over 30 years in business and $2.9 million in annual revenue, a beloved Canadian food-retailer couldn’t consistently make payroll for 50+ staff without shuffling cash week to week. The brand was strong. Customer loyalty was high. But their margins weren’t holding. 

Leadership suspected deeper structural issues but couldn’t isolate the problem. Before any restructuring or growth planning could begin, they needed an end-to-end view of what was draining profitability, and a plan to stabilize both cash and confidence.

Strategic Outcome

Despite decades in operation, the partner lacked a unified lens to understand where any why margin was eroding. The data existed, but the patterns, causes, and corrective levers were hiding in plain sight. 

Harms delivered a forensic financial diagnostic and SKU rationalization strategy, revealing the structural drivers behind the partner’s margin erosion. Through product-level analysis and operational modeling, we identified the clearest paths to recovery, retiring low-margin SKUs, optimizing pricing, bundling for lift, and anchoring a new margin architecture to guide future decision-making. 

Engagement Tier Fit

This engagement spanned both our Reset and Scale tiers, delivered through the Execution Performance Diagnostic and Capital Efficiency & Burn Optimization Diagnostic. These frameworks were used in tandem to decode margin erosion, isolate cost leakage, and reframe revenue opportunity through a capital efficiency lens.


Signal Diagnoses

  • Gross margin pressure made it difficult to consistently cover labor, overhead and COGs
  • Over 300 SKUs on offer, no deactivation or retirement criteria in place
  • Spoilage and food waste were unmanaged, with no active containment strategy
  • No unified operational oversight leaving burn rate remained unchecked
  • Staffing was reactive and misaligned with product-level profitability and demand rhythm

The Reframe

Harms conducted a full forensic review across revenue, discounting, and SKU performance, revealing structural drag and hidden inefficiencies across locations. The product portfolio lacked guardrails, leading to margin dilution and operational bloat. We introduced a tiered SKU strategy, and a phased audit plan aligned inclusive of pricing elasticity analysis with executive decision leverage. 

This was not a repositioning, it was a reset. The SKU portfolio became the lens through which waste, dilution and brand misalignment could be addressed systematically. 

 

System Shifts Delivered

  1. Tiered SKU strategy with immediate retirements and future-stage bundling options
  2. Pricing optimization framework to guide revenue-weighted adjustments 
  3. Margin guardrails and product discipline criteria to contain future product portfolio drift
  4. Structural COGs strategy, including spoilage thresholds and prep-cost alignment
  5. Decision hierarchy redesign to reduce operational drag and improve leverage
  6. Preserved brand fidelity while improving cost-to-value ratio

What’s Different Now

Harms outlined a clear path to reclaim 30-40 percentage points in gross margin by surfacing hidden cost leakage, rationalizing SKUs, and realigning pricing strategy. 

The organization now has the tools and clarity to make surgical cost cuts, simplify operations, and re-anchor margin performance. By translating raw financials into strategic insight, Harms enabled leadership to move from reactive troubleshooting to proactive margin management. 

Rather than treating product selection as a mechanism solely for merchandising, they now have a lens to view it as a lever of profitability, privileging high-performance items, constraining portfolio sprawl, and steering toward sustainable growth. 

  1. Assessed viability and redesigned the cost structure for sustainability 
  2. Analyzed the financial and operational impact of 300+ SKUs across locations
  3. Prioritized high-margin products and surfaced underperforming drag items
  4. Provided a decision framework to constrain product additions and portfolio drift
  5. Leadership now equipped to manage toward 65-75% margin contribution 

This remains an active engagement for a broader operational audit scoped for rollout.

Replication Signal

High revenue doesn't always mean high performance. If your margins are eroding despite steady sales, the issue isn’t effort, it’s architecture. 

This engagement proves that even long-standing, beloved brands can suffer from silent cost leakage and product complexity that drag down profitability. But with the right diagnostic lens, recovery can begin quickly. 

Harms can help you surface margin erosion, decode operational drag, and architect a model that privileges performance without compromising brand integrity. 


Time-to-shift: 1 month (Phase 1), 3-6 months for the full operational overhaul (Phase 2)

Author: Jesse Harms, President
Human-led. AI-assisted. Always accountable.

Curious what a Harms diagnostic might reveal in your organization?
→ Start the conversation

 

#Tier(s): Reset and Scale
#Engagement Name(s):
Execution Performance Diagnostic and Capital Efficiency & Burn Optimization Diagnostic
#Sector:
Food & Beverage, Retail/DTC, Mission-Led  Ventures
#Competencies:
Cost & Margin Optimization, Product Line Rationalization, Strategic Pricing & Bundling, Operational Audit Design, Retail SKU Velocity Analysis, Financial Triage & COGs Analysis, Margin Architecture
#Inflection point:
Burn Rate Pressure, Margin Collapse, SKU Creep/Complexity Drag, Brand Dilution, Break-Even Vulnerability, Founder Fatigue

Similar posts